Single post
Ukraine and Iran just demonstrated the same lesson at two different scales, and somehow Canada learned the exact opposite lesson. 🇨🇦🪖
🇺🇦 Ukraine: multimillion-dollar tanks meet cheap drones costing thousands. Persistent surveillance + FPVs turned massed armour from the centerpiece of manoeuvre warfare into an increasingly vulnerable liability.
Canadian lesson: BUY NEW TANKS. 🤑
🇮🇷 Iran / Middle East: missiles and drones demonstrate the economics of saturation. The attacker can launch relatively cheap, numerous weapons while the defender needs sensors, bases, crews and expensive interceptors, and has to keep paying every time the attacker sends another wave.
Canadian lesson: BUILD BILLION-DOLLAR AIR DEFENCE. 🤑
See the pattern?
$5,000 threat → protect the $10,000,000 machine.
Cheap swarm → build the $1,000,000,000 shield.
Shield can be saturated → buy more interceptors.
Still vulnerable → add another defensive layer.
The battlefield keeps demonstrating dispersion, quantity, cheap autonomous systems and asymmetric economics.
The procurement system keeps hearing:
"Excellent argument for another billion dollars."
At some point you have to wonder whether Canada is studying modern warfare or running a military-industrial loyalty-points program.
WAR REWARDS™
Spend $1 billion, discover a new vulnerability, earn the opportunity to spend the next billion. 🔁💰